High Court Adds Climate Change and Immigration Matters to Role | Fremont Tribune – Government and Politics

WASHINGTON (AP) – Despite objections from the Biden administration, the Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider a climate change case that could limit the power of the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The court also said it would hear a Republican-led immigration challenge.

The cases will be debated no earlier than 2022 and, as usual, the High Court has not explained its decision to take either case. Both are unusual, however, as the Biden administration has changed or said it will change the rules at the center of each case.

On climate change, the tribunal will review a decision by a federal appeals court that overturned one of the Trump administration’s most significant climate setbacks. The Biden administration said it was working on a replacement rule.

In practice, the decision to revisit the ruling in the case will likely make it more difficult for the Biden administration to move forward with a new rule to regulate the carbon emissions from the electricity sector that heat the planet.

West Virginia, at the head of a coalition of 19 predominantly Republican-led states, and coal companies told the High Court asking it to take into account that the appeals court ruling would give to the EPA almost unlimited power to regulate in a way that would harm the coal industry. .

People also read …

“How we respond to climate change is a pressing issue for our country, but some of the ways forward entail significant and disproportionate costs to states and countless other parties involved,” the states wrote urging the tribunal to take up the matter. “Continuing uncertainty over the scope of the EPA’s authority will impose costs that we can never recover.

In a statement posted on Twitter after the court agreed to hear the case, EPA administrator Michael Regan said: “Carbon pollution from power plants harms families and communities, and threatens businesses and workers. Courts have repeatedly upheld the power of the EPA to regulate dangerous carbon pollution from power plants.

The court will also consider whether Republican-led states can support the defense of a Trump-era rule denying green cards to immigrants who use public benefits like food stamps, after the Biden administration abandoned legal challenges.

A Chicago federal appeals court upheld a lower court order overturning the Trump-era rule nationwide. In March, the Biden administration announced an agreement with parties and states challenging the rule and also dropped its objections to the appeal decision.

The administration proposed a new rule in August.

Under the policy of the Trump administration, green card applicants had to show that they would not be a burden on the country or “public burdens.”

Federal law already required those seeking permanent residence or legal status to prove that they would not be a “public office.” But the Trump administration’s rule included a wider range of programs that could disqualify them, like Medicaid, housing vouchers, or other public benefits.

The immigration case is led by the state of Arizona.

Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

About Jefferey G. Cannon

Check Also

Court weighs dispute over online publication of voting records | United States government and politics

By MORGAN LEE – Associated Press ALBUQUERQUE, NM (AP) — A conservative-backed foundation that aims …